Back to template

RACI Chart Examples

These RACI matrix examples show how different teams define ownership across tasks, decisions, and deliverables. Use them when you need a starting point that matches your context, then adapt the roles and rows to fit your own project.

RACI Chart Examples

Real examples

Software feature delivery

Who uses it: Engineering team planning a new product feature

Task | PM | Eng Lead | Designer | QA | Data
Feature spec | A | C | R | I | C
Technical design | C | A | I | I | R
Implementation | I | A | I | C | I
QA sign-off | I | C | I | A | I
Analytics tracking | C | I | I | I | A

Why this works: Keeping analytics ownership with the Data team avoids last-minute tracking gaps. The PM stays Accountable on spec but moves to Consulted once engineering owns the build phase.

Marketing campaign launch

Who uses it: Marketing manager coordinating a multi-channel campaign

Task | Mktg Mgr | Copywriter | Designer | Media | Legal
Campaign brief | A | C | C | I | I
Ad copy | A | R | C | I | C
Creative assets | A | C | R | I | I
Media plan | A | I | I | R | I
Legal review | C | C | I | I | A
Go-live | A | I | I | R | C

Why this works: Legal is consulted on copy but Accountable only for their own review step. This prevents legal from becoming a blocker on tasks they only need to be aware of.

University group project

Who uses it: Students dividing work for a semester project

Task | Lead | Research | Writing | Design
Topic scoping | A | C | I | I
Literature | I | A | C | I
Draft writing | C | C | A | I
Visuals | I | I | C | A
Final review | A | C | R | R

Why this works: Even in a small team, a RACI avoids the common student-project problem where everyone waits for someone else to take the lead on each deliverable.

Employee hiring process

Who uses it: HR team documenting a recruiting workflow

Step | HR | Hiring Mgr | Recruiter | Finance
Job description | C | A | R | I
Sourcing | I | I | A | I
Interviews | C | A | R | I
Offer approval | C | R | I | A
Onboarding plan | A | C | I | I

Why this works: Finance is Accountable only for offer approval, keeping them out of earlier steps. This RACI reduced back-and-forth by clarifying that the Hiring Manager signs off on interviews, not HR.

Compliance audit preparation

Who uses it: Operations team preparing for an annual security audit

Task | CISO | Eng | Legal | Finance | HR
Policy review | A | C | R | I | C
Evidence collection | A | R | C | R | R
Risk assessment | A | C | C | I | I
Remediation plan | A | R | C | C | I
Auditor response | R | C | A | I | I

Why this works: Multiple R assignments on evidence collection reflect that each department owns their own data. The CISO stays Accountable throughout but Legal takes the A on formal auditor responses.

Content production pipeline

Who uses it: Creator building a repeatable publishing workflow

Step | Creator | Editor | Designer | Publisher
Outline | A | C | I | I
Draft | A | C | I | I
Edit | C | A | I | I
Visuals | C | I | A | I
Publishing | I | C | I | A

Why this works: The creator owns early stages but hands off Accountability for editing and publishing to specialists. This reduces revision cycles because each step has a single sign-off owner.

Tips for better study mind maps

  • Every row must have exactly one A — if you see two, decide who truly owns the outcome and move the other to R or C.
  • If a person appears as R on every row, they may be overloaded; look for tasks to redistribute.
  • C means you need their input before deciding; I means you tell them after. Mixing the two is the most common RACI mistake.
  • Keep the matrix to eight rows or fewer per review session — longer matrices lose focus during team walkthroughs.

Start editing online

Go back to the template, swap in your own topics, and keep the same structure if it fits your class or project.

Use this template: /editor/new?template=raci-chart

Use this RACI template