Git Flow Diagram Examples

These Git Flow examples show how different teams adapt the standard model to their release cadence and risk tolerance. From a simple two-branch setup to a multi-service hotfix process, each example maps a real scenario so you can copy the structure and tailor it to your own workflow.

Edit this Git Flow template Back to template

Real examples

SaaS product with scheduled releases

Who uses it: Engineering team shipping a web application on a two-week release cycle

main: production-only, tagged on every release

develop: features land here after review

feature/user-auth, feature/dashboard: short-lived, merged before release cut

release/2.3: cut from develop, only bug fixes allowed, merged to main as v2.3

hotfix/2.3.1: emergency patch, merged to both main and develop

Why this works: The release branch acts as a code freeze gate — no new features after the cut, only stabilization. This lets the team ship predictably while continuing develop work in parallel.

Mobile app with App Store review delays

Who uses it: iOS/Android developer managing a submission pipeline

main: only updated after store approval

develop: continuous integration target

feature/*: one branch per ticket, merged via pull request

release/3.0: includes store metadata and build configuration changes

hotfix/3.0.1: critical crash fix submitted as an expedited review

Why this works: App Store review times make the release branch especially important — it decouples the submission queue from ongoing feature development and gives QA a stable artifact to test.

Open-source library with LTS support

Who uses it: Maintainer supporting multiple major versions simultaneously

main: latest stable, aligns with v4.x

develop: next major version work in progress

v3-maintenance: long-term support branch, security patches only

feature/new-api: experimental, merged after RFC approval

hotfix/4.0.1: patch backported to both main and v3-maintenance

Why this works: Maintaining a separate LTS branch means a hotfix must be applied twice — once to main and once to the maintenance branch. The diagram makes this dual-merge obligation visible to contributors.

Student learning Git Flow for the first time

Who uses it: Computer science student or bootcamp graduate practicing branching workflows

main: only one commit — the initial project scaffold

develop: where all class assignments are integrated

feature/add-login: first feature branch, merged after peer code review

release/v0.1: tagged for the mid-term submission

hotfix/fix-typo: practice run for an emergency patch workflow

Why this works: Running through a complete Git Flow cycle on a small project — even with trivial changes — builds the muscle memory needed to apply it on production codebases without hesitation.

Microservices team with per-service Git Flow

Who uses it: Platform engineering team managing five independent services

Each service repo has its own main / develop / feature structure

Release branches are cut by the release manager across all affected services

Hotfixes in a downstream service trigger a coordinated patch across dependent services

Version tags use semantic versioning per service, not a global release number

Why this works: In a microservices environment, Git Flow per service keeps blast radius small — a hotfix in the auth service does not require a release of the payments service.

Tips for better study mind maps

Keep feature branches short-lived — anything open longer than a week increases merge conflict risk.
Name branches consistently: feature/, release/, hotfix/ prefixes make the diagram self-documenting.
Tag every main merge with a semantic version number so the diagram doubles as a release history.
If your team rarely uses release branches, simplify to a three-branch model: main, develop, feature.

Start editing online

Go back to the template, swap in your own topics, and keep the same structure if it fits your class or project.

Use this template: /editor/new?template=git-flow

Edit this Git Flow template